September 14th, 2011

...now browsing by day

 

Expunction Law Changes Texas

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

On May 1, 2011, changes made to the Texas Expunction statute by the 82nd Legislature will take effect. Chapter 55 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure was altered to help defendants obtain employment, housing, as well as education. The changes were meant to overrule State v. Beam, 226 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2007), which held that a dismissed charge cannot be expunged until the statute of limitations had run.

Subsection (a)(2) was completely re-written. Language was added that entitles a person to an expunction (destruction of their criminal records), regardless of the statute of limitations, if an indictment or information has not been presented at any time after the arrest, and: at least 180 days has passed since arrest for a Class C misdemeanor such as public intoxication, at least one year has passed since arrest for a Class B or Class A misdemeanor; at least 3 years has passed since an arrest for a felony; or regardless of the waiting periods, the attorney representing the state certifies that applicable arrest records and files are not needed for use in any criminal investigation or prosecution, including an investigation or prosecution of another person. However, even if an indictment or information has been presented against the defendant, the attorney for the state can recommend the person for an expunction. If the attorney representing the state authorized to prosecute the offense that caused the defendant to be arrested, and recommends the expunction to the district court before the defendant is tried for the offense the defendant may obtain an early expunction.
The problem is figuring out how amenable prosecutors in the Travis County District Attorney’s Office, Travis County Attorney’s Office, and Prosecutors for the city of Austin will be to an early expunction. This law will cause statewide differences in how early expunctions are treated.

Right to an Expunction in Travis County, Texas

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

CHAPTER 55. EXPUNCTION OF CRIMINAL RECORDS

Art. 55.01. RIGHT TO EXPUNCTION. (a) A person who has been placed under a custodial or noncustodial arrest for commission of either a felony or misdemeanor is entitled to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged if:

(1) the person is tried for the offense for which the person was arrested and is:

(A) acquitted by the trial court, except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section; or

(B) convicted and subsequently pardoned; or

(2) each of the following conditions exist:

(A) an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony has not been presented against the person for an offense arising out of the transaction for which the person was arrested or, if an indictment or information charging the person with commission of a felony was presented, the indictment or information has been dismissed or quashed, and:

(i) the limitations period expired before the date on which a petition for expunction was filed under Article 55.02; or

(ii) the court finds that the indictment or information was dismissed or quashed because the person completed a pretrial intervention program authorized under Section 76.011, Government Code, or because the presentment had been made because of mistake, false information, or other similar reason indicating absence of probable cause at the time of the dismissal to believe the person committed the offense or because it was void;

(B) the person has been released and the charge, if any, has not resulted in a final conviction and is no longer pending and there was no court ordered community supervision under Article 42.12 for any offense other than a Class C misdemeanor; and

(C) the person has not been convicted of a felony in the five years preceding the date of the arrest.

(a-1) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2)(C), a person’s conviction of a felony in the five years preceding the date of the arrest does not affect the person’s entitlement to expunction for purposes of an ex parte petition filed on behalf of the person by the director of the Department of Public Safety under Section 2(e), Article 55.02.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c) of this section, a district court may expunge all records and files relating to the arrest of a person who has been arrested for commission of a felony or misdemeanor under the procedure established under Article 55.02 of this code if the person is:

(1) tried for the offense for which the person was arrested;

(2) convicted of the offense; and

(3) acquitted by the court of criminal appeals.

(c) A court may not order the expunction of records and files relating to an arrest for an offense for which a person is subsequently acquitted, whether by the trial court or the court of criminal appeals, if the offense for which the person was acquitted arose out of a criminal episode, as defined by Section 3.01, Penal Code, and the person was convicted of or remains subject to prosecution for at least one other offense occurring during the criminal episode.

(d) A person is entitled to have any information that identifies the person, including the person’s name, address, date of birth, driver’s license number, and social security number, contained in records and files relating to the arrest of another person expunged if:

(1) the information identifying the person asserting the entitlement to expunction was falsely given by the person arrested as the arrested person’s identifying information without the consent of the person asserting the entitlement; and

(2) the only reason for the information identifying the person asserting the entitlement being contained in the arrest records and files of the person arrested is that the information was falsely given by the person arrested as the arrested person’s identifying information.

Thank you for using IGIT Tweet Button, a plugin by PHP Freelancer
Google plus one provided by online-casino